PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMB.L vs. SPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.33%8.06%9.19%6.03%-7.53%0.41%3.12%13.82%1.58%1.51%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
1.58%0.85%10.43%7.17%0.06%6.61%3.51%8.85%2.39%-1.93%
Different Trading Currencies

SEMB.L is traded in GBp, while SPHY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPHY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMB.L achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPHY's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMB.L has underperformed SPHY with an annualized return of 5.54%, while SPHY has yielded a comparatively higher 6.07% annualized return.


SEMB.L

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
0.33%
6M
4.00%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
5.54%

SPHY

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.71%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
6.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHY's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEMB.L vs. SPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMB.L
SEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHY
SPHY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMB.LSPHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.55

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

0.81

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

0.87

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.11

2.50

+3.61

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the SPHY Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMB.L and SPHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMB.LSPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.55

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.59

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between SEMB.L and SPHY is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Dividend Comparison

SEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than SPHY's 7.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.87%7.87%7.27%7.21%6.70%5.35%5.28%6.25%6.15%6.48%6.88%7.10%
SPHY
SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF
7.37%7.38%7.80%7.30%6.47%5.13%5.63%5.73%4.09%4.41%4.27%4.29%

Drawdowns

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than SPHY's maximum drawdown of -14.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMB.L and SPHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMB.LSPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-21.97%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-4.07%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-15.29%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.43%

-21.97%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.06%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-2.32%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

0.78%

+0.66%

Volatility

SEMB.L vs. SPHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) have volatilities of 2.19% and 2.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEMB.LSPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.20%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.68%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.27%

8.12%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

8.54%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.71%

10.69%

+0.02%