PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMB.L is traded in GBp, while EMGA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMGA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMB.L achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than EMGA.L's 1.20% return.


SEMB.L

1D
0.37%
1M
2.16%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.73%
1Y
14.74%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
5.65%

EMGA.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.67%
YTD
1.20%
6M
0.93%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.75%8.06%9.19%6.03%-7.53%0.41%3.12%13.82%4.63%
EMGA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.20%9.83%-1.04%6.07%-0.36%-9.65%-1.15%7.46%1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMB.L and EMGA.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMB.L
SEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EMGA.L
EMGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMB.LEMGA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.16

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

6.33

+5.85

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the EMGA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMB.L and EMGA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMB.LEMGA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.38

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.25

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.15

+0.67

Drawdowns

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, roughly equal to the maximum EMGA.L drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMB.L and EMGA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMB.LEMGA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-21.52%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-4.60%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.69%

-4.60%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-11.30%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.67%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-10.33%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.57%

-0.36%

Volatility

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) is 1.77%, while iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMGA.L) has a volatility of 2.22%. This indicates that SEMB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMGA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMB.LEMGA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

2.22%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

6.18%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

7.18%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.76%

8.45%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

10.12%

+0.55%

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMB.L vs. EMGA.L - Dividend Comparison

SEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, while EMGA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMGA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Local Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.83%7.87%7.27%7.21%6.70%5.35%5.28%6.25%6.15%6.48%6.88%7.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMB.L and EMGA.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMGA.L.

SEMB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMGA.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SEMB.L and 0.50% for EMGA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMB.L and EMGA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer