PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMB.L achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than EMDG.L's 1.60% return.


SEMB.L

1D
0.37%
1M
2.16%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.73%
1Y
14.74%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
5.65%

EMDG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.41%
1Y
7.92%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.75%8.06%9.19%6.03%-7.53%0.41%-0.15%
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
1.60%2.35%10.43%1.99%0.28%0.96%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMB.L and EMDG.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.75

The correlation between SEMB.L and EMDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMB.L
SEMB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDG.L
EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMB.LEMDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.10

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

6.03

+6.15

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMB.L and EMDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMB.LEMDG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.36

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.37

+0.46

Drawdowns

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than EMDG.L's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMB.L and EMDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMB.LEMDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-12.32%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-3.76%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.69%

-7.93%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.70%

-12.32%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-4.33%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.31%

-0.10%

Volatility

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) have volatilities of 1.77% and 1.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMB.LEMDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.78%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

4.08%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

5.81%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.76%

7.86%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

7.82%

+2.85%

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMB.L vs. EMDG.L - Dividend Comparison

SEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than EMDG.L's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDG.L
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
5.33%5.95%5.95%4.65%2.91%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEMB.L
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.83%7.87%7.27%7.21%6.70%5.35%5.28%6.25%6.15%6.48%6.88%7.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMB.L and EMDG.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMDG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMDG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SEMB.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SEMB.L and 0.25% for EMDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMB.L and EMDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer