EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L).

EMDG.L and SBEM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMDG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Dec 3, 2020. SBEM.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Jan 29, 2016. Both EMDG.L and SBEM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	0.83%	2.35%	10.43%	1.99%	0.28%	0.96%	-1.56%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	-0.32%	7.42%	9.46%	5.94%	-10.24%	-1.29%	-0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDG.L achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than SBEM.L's -0.32% return.

EMDG.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 3.58%
• 10Y*: —

SBEM.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 7.76%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 4.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SBEM.L's 0.42% expense ratio.

SBEM.L

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

EMDG.L

L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDG.L

EMDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EMDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EMDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EMDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EMDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

SBEM.L

SBEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SBEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SBEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SBEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMDG.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.97	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	1.35	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.18	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	2.00	-0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	6.15	-3.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDG.L and SBEM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMDG.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.97	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.35	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.46	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between EMDG.L and SBEM.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Dividend Comparison

EMDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than SBEM.L's 6.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMDG.L L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	5.37%	5.95%	5.95%	4.65%	2.91%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	6.72%	7.69%	6.28%	6.49%	5.72%	4.35%	4.92%	4.83%	4.47%	4.84%	2.27%

Drawdowns

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDG.L drawdown since its inception was -12.32%, smaller than the maximum SBEM.L drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDG.L and SBEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDG.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-21.61%	+9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.76%	-5.59%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.32%	-17.20%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-2.45%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-7.35%	+2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.34%	+0.38%

Volatility

EMDG.L vs. SBEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMDG.L) is 1.86%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that EMDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDG.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	2.39%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.36%	4.88%	-0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.44%	7.98%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	8.91%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	10.93%	-3.04%