PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEMA.L is traded in GBp, while VFEM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VFEM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 26.04% return, which is significantly higher than VFEM.DE's 11.77% return.


SEMA.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
6.37%
YTD
26.04%
6M
28.18%
1Y
53.95%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.90%

VFEM.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.46%
YTD
11.77%
6M
11.97%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.04%25.09%9.38%3.47%-10.74%-1.60%14.69%12.62%-9.25%2.20%
VFEM.DE
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
11.77%17.20%14.60%1.22%-6.15%-1.16%9.40%17.14%-8.05%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMA.L and VFEM.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.93

The correlation between SEMA.L and VFEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEM.DE
VFEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEMA.LVFEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.38

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

3.37

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.45

11.24

+6.21

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMA.L and VFEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEMA.LVFEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.13

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.39

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.04

Drawdowns

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than VFEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and VFEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMA.LVFEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-25.58%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-8.85%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.23%

-16.05%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-19.68%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-1.53%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-8.39%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.66%

+0.42%

Volatility

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) at 5.20%. This indicates that SEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMA.LVFEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

5.20%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

11.39%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

14.06%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

15.67%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.95%

+0.10%

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEM.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEMA.L vs. VFEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFEM.DE
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
2.04%2.39%2.28%2.66%3.38%2.26%1.93%2.32%2.79%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SEMA.L and VFEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEM.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SEMA.L and 0.22% for VFEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMA.L and VFEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer