PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SELV vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SELV vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SELV vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
0.09%12.86%14.71%6.58%1.38%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
-1.88%12.08%13.27%16.57%0.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's -1.88% return.


SELV

1D
0.80%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
0.09%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
1.43%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
0.91%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SELV vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SELV vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELV vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SELVPSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.37

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

2.05

-1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.99

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.56

10.21

-5.64

SELV vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELV and PSCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SELVPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.37

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.10

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between SELV and PSCX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SELV vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.74%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SELV vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and PSCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SELVPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-10.20%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-6.15%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-2.84%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-1.92%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.20%

+0.65%

Volatility

SELV vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 2.64%, while Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SELVPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.81%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.25%

4.31%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

8.83%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

7.06%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

7.02%

+4.92%