SELV vs. NRSH
SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SELV is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, SELV returned 5.79% vs 59.62% for NRSH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
SELV vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 48.32% return.
SELV
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 48.32%
- 6M
- 44.73%
- 1Y
- 59.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SELV vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | -0.78% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 2.99% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 48.32% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 9.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SELV and NRSH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SELV and NRSH has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SELV vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SELV
NRSH
Technology
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
SELV
NRSH
Healthcare
SELV
NRSH
-
Communication Services
SELV
NRSH
-
Consumer Defensive
SELV
NRSH
-
Utilities
SELV
NRSH
-
Industrials
SELV
NRSH
Consumer Cyclical
SELV
NRSH
-
Financial Services
SELV
NRSH
-
Energy
SELV
NRSH
Basic Materials
SELV
NRSH
-
Real Estate
SELV
NRSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SELV vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
SELV
NRSH
SELV vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SELV | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.38 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 5.48 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 16.66 | -13.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SELV vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SELV | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -24.01% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -10.94% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | 0.00% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -5.56% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 3.59% | -1.44% |
Volatility
SELV vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 2.91%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SELV | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 9.85% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 21.51% | -14.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.97% | 25.85% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 22.00% | -10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 22.00% | -10.11% |
SELV vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SELV vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.80% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SELV and NRSH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to SELV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 59.62% vs 5.79% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 59.62% return vs 5.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
They also come from different issuers: SEI and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SELV and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer