SEIX vs. ASGM
SEIX (Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIX is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index, while ASGM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Virtus. SEIX is passively managed, while ASGM is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEIX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.
Performance
SEIX vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 22.52% return.
SEIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIX vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF | 2.09% | 2.33% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 22.52% | 11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIX and ASGM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIX vs. ASGM — Risk / Return Rank
SEIX
ASGM
SEIX vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIX | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIX | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 2.95 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
SEIX vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIX drawdown since its inception was -17.51%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIX and ASGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIX | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.51% | -6.62% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.53% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -1.22% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | — | — |
Volatility
SEIX vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIX | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61% | 15.67% | -14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 15.67% | -12.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 15.67% | -11.33% |
SEIX vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIX vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison
SEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than ASGM's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.69% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF | 7.25% | 7.52% | 8.09% | 8.74% | 5.76% | 4.16% | 3.75% | 3.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIX and ASGM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 3.69% for ASGM.
SEIX is categorized as Bank Loan, while ASGM is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for SEIX and 0.86% for ASGM.
Find the right allocation for SEIX and ASGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer