SEIV vs. LEND
SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) and LEND (SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while LEND is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by SEI. Both are actively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEND.
Performance
SEIV vs. LEND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 41.26%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.48%
LEND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.84M | $3.67M | $2.39M | |
| $8.91M | $9.09M | $6.11M |
SEIV vs. LEND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF | 8.74% |
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIV and LEND is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIV vs. LEND — Risk / Return Rank
SEIV
LEND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SEIV vs. LEND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) and SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF (LEND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEIV | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEIV vs. LEND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, which is greater than LEND's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and LEND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIV | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -1.00% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.74% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -0.32% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility
SEIV vs. LEND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIV | LEND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 3.33% | +9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 3.33% | +13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 3.33% | +13.21% |
SEIV vs. LEND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LEND's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIV vs. LEND - Dividend Comparison
SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than LEND's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEND SEI High Yield Bond & Alternative Credit ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIV and LEND have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEND.
SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.98% for LEND.
SEIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LEND is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.65% for LEND.
Find the right allocation for SEIV and LEND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer