PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEEM vs. SELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEEM vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEM achieves a 29.50% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 2.37% return.


SEEM

1D
-1.14%
1M
6.25%
YTD
29.50%
6M
33.05%
1Y
57.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SELV

1D
0.67%
1M
1.14%
YTD
2.37%
6M
3.42%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEM vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
29.50%38.16%-6.86%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
2.37%12.86%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEM and SELV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEEM vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEM vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEEMSELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.17

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.42

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

4.11

+12.38

SEEM vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEM and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEEMSELVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

0.96

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.85

0.79

+1.07

Drawdowns

SEEM vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SELV drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and SELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEEMSELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-13.73%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-5.92%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.52%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-2.36%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.04%

+1.49%

Volatility

SEEM vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) at 2.82%. This indicates that SEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEEMSELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

2.82%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.07%

6.38%

+10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

8.81%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

11.85%

+7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

11.85%

+7.95%

SEEM vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEEM vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than SELV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.45%3.31%0.31%0.00%0.00%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.75%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEEM and SELV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to SELV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEM dropped -14.34% vs SELV's -13.73%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 57.95% vs 8.37% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 57.95% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.75% for SELV.

SEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SELV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.15% for SELV.

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEEM and SELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer