PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEEM vs. SELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEEM vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEM achieves a 21.89% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 6.90% return.


SEEM

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.18%
6M
11.47%
YTD
21.89%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.48%

SELV

1D
0.50%
1M
2.81%
6M
4.09%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
14.21%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.35M$2.55M$2.06M
$608.47K$511.20K$528.68K

SEEM vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
21.89%38.16%-6.66%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
6.90%12.86%-0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEM and SELV is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.13

The correlation between SEEM and SELV shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEEM vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEEM vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEEMSELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.33

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

6.25

+2.88

SEEM vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEM and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEEM vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SELV drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and SELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEEMSELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-13.73%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-5.92%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

-0.91%

-8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-2.35%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

2.21%

+2.23%

Volatility

SEEM vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) at 4.54%. This indicates that SEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEEMSELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

4.54%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

8.02%

+13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.71%

9.86%

+13.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

11.98%

+9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

11.98%

+9.61%

SEEM vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEEM vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than SELV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.73%3.31%0.31%0.00%0.00%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.67%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEEM and SELV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to SELV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEM dropped -14.34% vs SELV's -13.73%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 41.57% vs 14.21% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 41.57% return vs 14.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.67% for SELV.

SEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SELV is Low Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.15% for SELV.

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEEM and SELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer