SEIS vs. ROSC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SEIS (SEI Select Small Cap ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SEIS is actively managed, while ROSC is passively managed. Over the past year, SEIS returned 30.81% vs 40.60% for ROSC. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SEIS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.

Performance

SEIS vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIS achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 21.44% return.

SEIS

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 11.23%
• YTD: 17.92%
• 1Y: 30.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.23%

ROSC

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 1.50%
• 6M: 14.44%
• YTD: 21.44%
• 1Y: 40.60%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 11.09%
• ALL TIME*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	$136.27K	$122.07K	$123.34K
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF	$2.08M	$1.63M	$1.54M

SEIS vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF	17.92%	9.81%	1.42%
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	21.44%	10.18%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIS and ROSC is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	0.88

The correlation between SEIS and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEIS vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIS

SEIS Risk / Return Rank: 64
SEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ROSC

ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 94
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIS vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIS	ROSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.71	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	3.97	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.48	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	5.26	-2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	17.73	-8.77

SEIS vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIS and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEIS vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIS drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIS and ROSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIS	ROSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-43.13%	+17.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-7.75%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-0.42%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-7.12%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	2.30%	+1.15%

Volatility

SEIS vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.55%. This indicates that SEIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIS	ROSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	3.55%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	10.12%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.43%	15.09%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	19.21%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	20.25%	+1.52%

SEIS vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIS vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

SEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ROSC's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF	1.77%	2.08%	2.00%	2.01%	1.51%	2.13%	1.75%	3.05%	2.86%	2.13%	2.20%	2.48%
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF	0.33%	0.59%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIS and ROSC in my portfolio?

SEIS and ROSC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIS or ROSC?

SEIS has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ROSC (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIS dropped -26.08% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

Which ETF is better, SEIS or ROSC?

On 1-year performance, ROSC leads with 40.60% vs 30.81% for SEIS. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIS or ROSC?

Over the 1-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 40.60% return vs 30.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIS or ROSC?

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SEIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIS or ROSC?

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.33% for SEIS.

What is the main difference between SEIS and ROSC?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SEIS and 0.34% for ROSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.