PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIS vs. BBSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIS vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIS achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 19.47% return.


SEIS

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.90%
YTD
17.00%
6M
14.13%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBSC

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.89%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.87%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIS vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
17.00%9.81%1.42%
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
19.47%10.38%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIS and BBSC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.96

The correlation between SEIS and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIS vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIS
SEIS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIS vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEISBBSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.11

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

13.44

-4.20

SEIS vs. BBSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BBSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIS and BBSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIS vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIS drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum BBSC drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIS and BBSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEISBBSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-30.96%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-9.54%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.56%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-11.39%

+5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.91%

+0.46%

Volatility

SEIS vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) at 5.51%. This indicates that SEIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEISBBSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.51%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

13.41%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

19.38%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.97%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.84%

-0.72%

SEIS vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIS vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison

SEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than BBSC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.00%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
0.36%0.59%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SEIS and BBSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEIS has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to BBSC (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIS dropped -26.08% vs BBSC's -30.96%.

On 1-year performance, BBSC leads with 39.05% vs 31.11% for SEIS. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 39.05% return vs 31.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SEIS.

BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.36% for SEIS.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SEIS and 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIS and BBSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer