SEIQ vs. FLRG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while FLRG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index. SEIQ is actively managed, while FLRG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIQ returned 13.84%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for FLRG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEIQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLRG.

Performance

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than FLRG's 9.53% return.

SEIQ

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 13.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 19.94%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	3.49%	12.51%	16.15%	22.66%	1.51%
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	9.53%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIQ and FLRG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.90

The correlation between SEIQ and FLRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEIQ	FLRG
Technology	32.8%	34.7%
Healthcare	20.7%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	13.1%	4.6%
Financial Services	10.3%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.7%
Industrials	6.7%	7.7%
Communication Services	5.3%	10.3%
Basic Materials	0.9%	2.5%
Energy	-	4.8%
Real Estate	-	2.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

SEIQ vs. FLRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 28
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 59
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEIQ	FLRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.98	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.81	-1.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	2.86	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	11.31	-6.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FLRG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIQ and FLRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEIQ	FLRG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.98	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.05	-0.10

Drawdowns

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum FLRG drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and FLRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIQ	FLRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-19.64%	+4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-7.16%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-16.53%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-3.74%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	1.81%	+0.65%

Volatility

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) have volatilities of 2.38% and 2.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIQ	FLRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	2.44%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	7.58%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	10.13%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.18%	-0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.02%	-0.43%

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRG's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIQ vs. FLRG - Dividend Comparison

SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FLRG's 1.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.34%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.92%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIQ and FLRG in my portfolio?

SEIQ and FLRG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIQ or FLRG?

FLRG has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to SEIQ (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs FLRG's -19.64%.

Which ETF is better, SEIQ or FLRG?

On 3-year performance, FLRG leads with 19.62% vs 13.84% for SEIQ. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIQ or FLRG?

Over the 3-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIQ or FLRG?

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIQ or FLRG?

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.92% for SEIQ.

What is the main difference between SEIQ and FLRG?

SEIQ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLRG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.29% for FLRG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.