SEIQ vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, SEIQ returned 6.42% vs 83.17% for AFOS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEIQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.60% return.

SEIQ

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.91%
• 1Y: 6.42%
• 3Y*: 12.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 33.60%
• 6M: 31.56%
• 1Y: 83.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	-0.73%	7.20%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	33.60%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIQ and AFOS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

SEIQ vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22

AFOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIQ	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	—	—

Drawdowns

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIQ	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-11.52%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-11.52%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-2.33%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-1.43%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SEIQ	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	21.58%	-10.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	21.58%	-6.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.59%	21.58%	-6.99%

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIQ vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.96%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIQ and AFOS in my portfolio?

SEIQ and AFOS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEIQ or AFOS?

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 83.17% vs 6.42% for SEIQ. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIQ or AFOS?

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 83.17% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIQ or AFOS?

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIQ or AFOS?

SEIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between SEIQ and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.45% for AFOS.