PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIM vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


SEIM

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.91%
6M
20.91%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIM vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
18.91%20.20%39.12%16.25%-2.39%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and XMMO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.85

The correlation between SEIM and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIM vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEIM
XMMO

Technology

29.5%
16.7%

Energy

11.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
6.3%

Financial Services

8.1%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
4.6%

Real Estate

7.2%
6.1%

Industrials

6.8%
41.1%

Basic Materials

4.7%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.4%
1.6%

Utilities

2.4%
5.8%

Technology

SEIM
29.5%
XMMO
16.7%

Energy

SEIM
11.8%
XMMO
7.7%

Healthcare

SEIM
9.5%
XMMO
6.3%

Financial Services

SEIM
8.1%
XMMO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SEIM
7.9%
XMMO
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SEIM
7.2%
XMMO
4.6%

Real Estate

SEIM
7.2%
XMMO
6.1%

Industrials

SEIM
6.8%
XMMO
41.1%

Basic Materials

SEIM
4.7%
XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

SEIM
4.4%
XMMO
1.6%

Utilities

SEIM
2.4%
XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIM vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIM vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIMXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

4.45

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

18.21

-2.03

SEIM vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIMXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.99

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.58

+0.61

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-55.37%

+33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-8.34%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.17%

-24.93%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-9.45%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.04%

+0.25%

Volatility

SEIM vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 4.68%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

7.82%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

15.54%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

18.71%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

21.45%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

22.27%

-3.41%

SEIM vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIM vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIM and XMMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 32.10% vs 29.67% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 32.10% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.35% for XMMO.

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIM and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer