SEIM vs. XMMO
SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. SEIM is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIM returned 29.67%/yr vs 32.10%/yr for XMMO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEIM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
SEIM vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
SEIM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
SEIM vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 18.91% | 20.20% | 39.12% | 16.25% | -2.39% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIM and XMMO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SEIM and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEIM vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIM
XMMO
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
SEIM
XMMO
Energy
SEIM
XMMO
Healthcare
SEIM
XMMO
Financial Services
SEIM
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
SEIM
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
SEIM
XMMO
Real Estate
SEIM
XMMO
Industrials
SEIM
XMMO
Basic Materials
SEIM
XMMO
Communication Services
SEIM
XMMO
Utilities
SEIM
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIM vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
SEIM
XMMO
SEIM vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 4.45 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.18 | 18.21 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.99 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.58 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
SEIM vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -55.37% | +33.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -8.34% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.17% | -24.93% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -9.45% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.04% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SEIM vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 4.68%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 7.82% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 15.54% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 18.71% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 21.45% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 22.27% | -3.41% |
SEIM vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIM vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIM and XMMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 3-year performance, XMMO leads with 32.10% vs 29.67% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 32.10% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.
They also come from different issuers: SEI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.35% for XMMO.
SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIM and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer