PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. SEEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIM vs. SEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than SEEM's 31.00% return.


SEIM

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.91%
6M
20.91%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
10Y*

SEEM

1D
-1.11%
1M
9.98%
YTD
31.00%
6M
34.54%
1Y
61.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIM vs. SEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
18.91%20.20%5.74%
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
31.00%38.16%-6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and SEEM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.62

The correlation between SEIM and SEEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIM vs. SEEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIM vs. SEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIMSEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.56

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

4.40

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

17.46

-1.27

SEIM vs. SEEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SEEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and SEEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIMSEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.13

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

1.91

-0.72

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. SEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than SEEM's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and SEEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMSEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-14.34%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-14.01%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.11%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-2.64%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.52%

-1.23%

Volatility

SEIM vs. SEEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 4.68%, while SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMSEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

8.28%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

17.02%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

19.69%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

19.80%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

19.80%

-0.94%

SEIM vs. SEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEM's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIM vs. SEEM - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SEEM's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.42%3.31%0.31%0.00%0.00%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIM and SEEM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs SEEM's -14.34%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 61.31% vs 36.91% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 61.31% return vs 36.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.52% for SEIM.

SEIM is categorized as Momentum, while SEEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIM and SEEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer