PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


SEIM

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.63%
YTD
18.91%
6M
20.91%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
18.91%20.20%39.12%16.25%-2.39%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and QQQA is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.84

The correlation between SEIM and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEIM
QQQA

Technology

29.5%
65.2%

Energy

11.8%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.5%
7.8%

Financial Services

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Industrials

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
13.7%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Technology

SEIM
29.5%
QQQA
65.2%

Energy

SEIM
11.8%
QQQA
9.1%

Healthcare

SEIM
9.5%
QQQA
7.8%

Financial Services

SEIM
8.1%
QQQA

-

Consumer Defensive

SEIM
7.9%
QQQA

-

Consumer Cyclical

SEIM
7.2%
QQQA
4.2%

Real Estate

SEIM
7.2%
QQQA

-

Industrials

SEIM
6.8%
QQQA

-

Basic Materials

SEIM
4.7%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

SEIM
4.4%
QQQA
13.7%

Utilities

SEIM
2.4%
QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIMQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

6.11

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

22.85

-6.66

SEIM vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIMQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

3.41

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.59

+0.60

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-38.44%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-14.54%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.17%

-30.84%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-15.68%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.88%

-1.59%

Volatility

SEIM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 4.68%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

10.17%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

22.18%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

26.05%

-9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

25.83%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

25.77%

-6.91%

SEIM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.52%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to SEIM (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 3-year performance, QQQA leads with 34.58% vs 29.67% for SEIM. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 34.58% return vs 29.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

SEIM has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

SEIM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: SEI and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIM and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer