PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIC vs. AAMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEIC vs. AAMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIC achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly lower than AAMI's 67.66% return.


SEIC

1D
1.42%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.01%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
7.60%

AAMI

1D
1.21%
1M
11.99%
YTD
67.66%
6M
65.23%
1Y
148.44%
3Y*
52.17%
5Y*
28.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIC vs. AAMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
9.64%0.63%31.47%10.59%-2.94%7.38%-11.10%43.35%-35.59%
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
67.66%78.64%37.70%-6.72%-19.45%33.00%93.85%-0.80%-30.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIC and AAMI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.50

The correlation between SEIC and AAMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEIC:

$11.13B

AAMI:

$2.81B

EPS

SEIC:

$5.85

AAMI:

$2.35

PE Ratio

SEIC:

15.27

AAMI:

33.42

PS Ratio

SEIC:

4.76

AAMI:

4.39

PB Ratio

SEIC:

4.54

AAMI:

36.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEIC:

$2.37B

AAMI:

$641.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEIC:

$925.04M

AAMI:

$652.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

SEIC:

$928.43M

AAMI:

$185.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIC vs. AAMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIC
SEIC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SEIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

AAMI
AAMI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AAMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AAMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIC vs. AAMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEICAAMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.55

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

8.21

-7.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

22.26

-21.51

SEIC vs. AAMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the AAMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIC and AAMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIC vs. AAMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIC drawdown since its inception was -71.17%, smaller than the maximum AAMI drawdown of -75.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIC and AAMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEICAAMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.17%

-75.23%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.36%

-18.20%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.25%

-31.52%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

-51.45%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

0.00%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-20.62%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.04%

6.70%

+3.34%

Volatility

SEIC vs. AAMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Investments Company (SEIC) is 5.42%, while Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that SEIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEICAAMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

11.53%

-6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

26.79%

-8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

39.95%

-17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.40%

34.69%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

42.10%

-16.31%

Dividends

SEIC vs. AAMI - Dividend Comparison

SEIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than AAMI's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
0.29%0.09%0.15%0.21%0.19%0.16%1.19%3.91%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
1.16%1.23%1.15%1.40%1.42%1.26%1.25%1.04%1.36%0.81%1.09%0.95%

Financials

SEIC vs. AAMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SEI Investments Company and Acadian Asset Management Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
622.18M
167.10M
(SEIC) Total Revenue
(AAMI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SEIC vs. AAMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SEI Investments Company and Acadian Asset Management Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
95.3%
Portfolio components
SEIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a gross profit of 159.30M and revenue of 167.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.3%.

SEIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported an operating income of 189.49M and revenue of 622.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.5%.

AAMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported an operating income of 42.00M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

SEIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SEI Investments Company reported a net income of 174.49M and revenue of 622.18M, resulting in a net margin of 28.0%.

AAMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadian Asset Management Inc reported a net income of 24.30M and revenue of 167.10M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SEIC and AAMI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAMI has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to SEIC (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIC dropped -71.17% vs AAMI's -75.23%.

AAMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIC and AAMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer