SEIC vs. SPY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).

SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.

Performance

SEIC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SEIC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEIC SEI Investments Company	-4.33%	0.63%	31.47%	10.59%	-2.94%	7.38%	-11.10%	43.35%	-34.92%	46.99%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	-4.37%	17.72%	24.89%	26.18%	-18.18%	28.73%	18.33%	31.22%	-4.57%	21.71%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEIC having a -4.33% return and SPY slightly lower at -4.37%. Over the past 10 years, SEIC has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 7.37%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.

SEIC

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: -4.33%
• 6M: -6.95%
• 1Y: 2.29%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

SPY

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -4.37%
• 6M: -1.82%
• 1Y: 17.59%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: 13.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SEIC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIC

SEIC Risk / Return Rank: 42
SEIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SEIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SEIC Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SEIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SEIC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SPY

SPY Risk / Return Rank: 64
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEIC	SPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	0.93	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	1.45	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.22	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.53	-1.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.32	7.30	-6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEIC vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIC and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEIC	SPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	0.93	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.69	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.78	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.56	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between SEIC and SPY is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SEIC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

SEIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEIC SEI Investments Company	1.29%	1.23%	1.15%	1.40%	1.42%	1.26%	1.25%	1.04%	1.36%	0.81%	1.09%	0.95%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	1.14%	1.07%	1.21%	1.40%	1.65%	1.20%	1.52%	1.75%	2.04%	1.80%	2.03%	2.06%

Drawdowns

SEIC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIC drawdown since its inception was -71.17%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIC and SPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIC	SPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.17%	-55.19%	-15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.78%	-12.05%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.00%	-24.50%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.78%	-33.72%	-18.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.83%	-6.24%	-9.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.25%	-9.09%	-12.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.44%	2.52%	+6.92%

Volatility

SEIC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

SEI Investments Company (SEIC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIC	SPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	5.31%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.60%	9.47%	+7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.79%	19.05%	+6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	17.06%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.76%	17.92%	+7.84%