SEF vs. USD
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while USD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.30%/yr vs 56.23%/yr for USD. At a correlation of -0.55, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SEF vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 63.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -12.30%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 56.23% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- -5.36%
- 3Y*
- -12.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.58%
- 10Y*
- -12.30%
USD
- 1D
- -7.37%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- YTD
- 63.25%
- 1Y
- 108.17%
- 3Y*
- 94.08%
- 5Y*
- 61.69%
- 10Y*
- 56.23%
SEF vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -2.09% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 63.25% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and USD is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008 | -0.55 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SEF and USD has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.55 to -0.09, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
SEF vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SEF
USD
Basic Materials
SEF
-
USD
-
Communication Services
SEF
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
USD
-
Energy
SEF
-
USD
Healthcare
SEF
-
USD
-
Industrials
SEF
-
USD
-
Real Estate
SEF
-
USD
-
Technology
SEF
-
USD
Utilities
SEF
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
USD
SEF vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 3.42 | -3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 8.81 | -9.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -88.63% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -31.80% | +16.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -64.46% | +25.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -77.85% | +36.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.40% | -77.85% | +4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.48% | -24.58% | -71.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.78% | -32.25% | -50.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 12.32% | -6.67% |
Volatility
SEF vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.21%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 30.75%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 30.75% | -26.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 58.47% | -47.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 71.05% | -56.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 78.28% | -60.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 70.10% | -49.66% |
SEF vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SEF and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SEF vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than USD's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.43% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and USD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (30.75%) compared to SEF (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 56.23% vs -12.30% for SEF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 56.23% return vs -12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.35% for USD.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while USD is Leveraged Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer