PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEF vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEF vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -11.60%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.09% annualized return.


SEF

1D
0.01%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.71%
6M
3.95%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
-10.66%
5Y*
-5.46%
10Y*
-11.60%

UPRO

1D
-2.09%
1M
14.64%
YTD
27.90%
6M
26.67%
1Y
80.84%
3Y*
52.58%
5Y*
23.13%
10Y*
30.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEF vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
7.71%-9.82%-17.81%-8.81%11.85%-27.02%-16.93%-23.51%10.34%-17.12%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
27.90%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and UPRO is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009

-0.83

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SEF and UPRO has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.83 to -0.62, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

SEF vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEF
UPRO

Financial Services

65.0%
28.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

17.8%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

SEF
65.0%
UPRO
28.8%

Basic Materials

SEF

-

UPRO
0.8%

Communication Services

SEF

-

UPRO
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SEF

-

UPRO
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

SEF

-

UPRO
2.0%

Energy

SEF

-

UPRO
1.4%

Healthcare

SEF

-

UPRO
3.8%

Industrials

SEF

-

UPRO
3.4%

Real Estate

SEF

-

UPRO
0.8%

Technology

SEF

-

UPRO
17.8%

Utilities

SEF

-

UPRO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEF vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEFUPRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

2.30

-2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.35

2.76

-2.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.36

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

3.03

-2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

12.80

-12.39

SEF vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEFUPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.30

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.46

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.57

0.56

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.65

-1.14

Drawdowns

SEF vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEFUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-76.82%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-26.78%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

-48.87%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-63.94%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

-76.82%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.13%

-2.09%

-94.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.71%

-14.42%

-68.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

6.33%

-1.20%

Volatility

SEF vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 2.92%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEFUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

8.45%

-5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

26.60%

-15.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

35.35%

-21.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

50.32%

-32.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

53.74%

-33.22%

SEF vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEF vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than UPRO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.38%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.68%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEF and UPRO have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to SEF (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.09% vs -11.60% for SEF. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.09% return vs -11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.68% for UPRO.

SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEF and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer