SEF vs. EQIN
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and EQIN (Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while EQIN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Columbia. SEF is passively managed, while EQIN is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.23%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for EQIN. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQIN.
Performance
SEF vs. EQIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than EQIN's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed EQIN with an annualized return of -12.23%, while EQIN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- -3.98%
- 3Y*
- -12.00%
- 5Y*
- -7.28%
- 10Y*
- -12.23%
EQIN
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 18.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
SEF vs. EQIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -1.02% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 12.20% | 9.37% | 13.82% | 11.58% | 0.66% | 31.18% | 0.67% | 30.67% | -12.22% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and EQIN is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | -0.75 |
The correlation between SEF and EQIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEF vs. EQIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
EQIN
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SEF
EQIN
Basic Materials
SEF
-
EQIN
Communication Services
SEF
-
EQIN
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
EQIN
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
EQIN
Energy
SEF
-
EQIN
Healthcare
SEF
-
EQIN
Industrials
SEF
-
EQIN
Real Estate
SEF
-
EQIN
-
Technology
SEF
-
EQIN
Utilities
SEF
-
EQIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. EQIN — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
EQIN
SEF vs. EQIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 3.43 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 10.26 | -10.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. EQIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than EQIN's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and EQIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -42.16% | -54.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -5.41% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -12.05% | -27.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -18.51% | -23.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.40% | -42.16% | -31.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.45% | 0.00% | -96.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.78% | -4.85% | -77.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 1.81% | +3.62% |
Volatility
SEF vs. EQIN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Financials (SEF) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) at 2.91%. This indicates that SEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 2.91% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 7.19% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 10.42% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 14.58% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 18.46% | +1.99% |
SEF vs. EQIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EQIN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. EQIN - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than EQIN's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 4.34% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.57% | 2.54% | 2.70% | 7.81% | 11.52% | 2.44% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.39% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and EQIN have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEF has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to EQIN (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs EQIN's -42.16%.
On 10-year performance, EQIN leads with 12.17% vs -12.23% for SEF. On fees, EQIN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQIN has performed better with a 12.17% return vs -12.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQIN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.86% for EQIN.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EQIN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.35% for EQIN.
EQIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and EQIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer