PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEEM vs. XC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEEM vs. XC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEM achieves a 31.00% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.47% return.


SEEM

1D
-1.11%
1M
9.98%
YTD
31.00%
6M
34.54%
1Y
61.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XC

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-3.47%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
8.33%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEM vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
31.00%38.16%-6.86%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
-3.47%18.19%-5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEM and XC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.77

The correlation between SEEM and XC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEEM vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEM vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.11

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

0.67

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

1.94

+15.51

SEEM vs. XC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the XC Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEM and XC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

0.57

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

0.71

+1.20

Drawdowns

SEEM vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum XC drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and XC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-20.97%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.01%

-12.47%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-9.35%

+8.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-4.12%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

4.29%

-0.77%

Volatility

SEEM vs. XC - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 5.00%. This indicates that SEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

5.00%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

12.60%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

14.78%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.80%

15.87%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

15.87%

+3.93%

SEEM vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEEM vs. XC - Dividend Comparison

SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than XC's 12.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.42%3.31%0.31%0.00%0.00%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
12.41%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEEM and XC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to XC (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEM dropped -14.34% vs XC's -20.97%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 61.31% vs 8.33% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 61.31% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

XC has the higher dividend yield at 12.41%, compared with 2.42% for SEEM.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.32% for XC.

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEEM and XC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer