SEEM vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SEEM (SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by SEI, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SEEM is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, SEEM returned 62.03% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. SEEM charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEEM achieves a 34.03% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

SEEM

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 8.87%
• YTD: 34.03%
• 6M: 36.33%
• 1Y: 62.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF	34.03%	38.16%	-6.66%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	-1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SEEM and ISCMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

SEEM vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEEM

SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 86
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 77
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEEM	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	1.76	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.18	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	2.31	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.45	5.53	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.01	11.95	+5.07

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEEM and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEEM drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEM and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEEM	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-25.42%	+11.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-5.69%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.26%	+5.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.66%	-13.36%	+10.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	2.63%	+1.03%

Volatility

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that SEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEEM	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.34%	5.11%	+5.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	15.45%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.57%	17.87%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	14.29%	+6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.74%	14.29%	+6.45%

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEEM vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEEM SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.37%	3.31%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEEM and ISCMF in my portfolio?

SEEM and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEEM or ISCMF?

SEEM has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEEM dropped -14.34% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, SEEM or ISCMF?

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 62.03% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEEM or ISCMF?

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 62.03% return vs 31.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEEM or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEEM or ISCMF?

SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between SEEM and ISCMF?

SEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEEM and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.