SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L
SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) and DEMR.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SEDY.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while DEMR.L tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEDY.L returned 4.99%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for DEMR.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEDY.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEMR.L.
Performance
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SEDY.L is traded in GBp, while DEMR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DEMR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEDY.L achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly lower than DEMR.L's 19.47% return.
SEDY.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
DEMR.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 8.06% | 18.70% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 12.65% | -5.85% | 10.44% | 0.25% | 14.72% |
DEMR.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF | 19.47% | 12.02% | 7.26% | 15.34% | -2.72% | 15.04% | -9.21% | 13.90% | -2.47% | 15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEDY.L and DEMR.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SEDY.L and DEMR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Energy
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Industrials
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Basic Materials
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Technology
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Utilities
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Consumer Cyclical
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Real Estate
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Consumer Defensive
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Communication Services
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
Healthcare
SEDY.L
-
DEMR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEDY.L
DEMR.L
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEDY.L | DEMR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 4.18 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 14.46 | -2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -51.33%, which is greater than DEMR.L's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDY.L and DEMR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEDY.L | DEMR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.33% | -29.06% | -22.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -6.77% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -13.17% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.67% | -14.67% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -2.62% | -2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -5.11% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.96% | +0.14% |
Volatility
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) is 4.56%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that SEDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEDY.L | DEMR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.92% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 10.93% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 13.36% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.82% | 13.97% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 16.53% | -0.35% |
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DEMR.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEDY.L vs. DEMR.L - Dividend Comparison
SEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, while DEMR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMR.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.18% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.99% | 9.32% | 6.42% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.07% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEDY.L and DEMR.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEMR.L is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEMR.L is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.
SEDY.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while DEMR.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SEDY.L and 0.46% for DEMR.L.
Find the right allocation for SEDY.L and DEMR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer