SECU vs. CMDY
SECU (iShares Securitized Income Active ETF) and CMDY (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECU is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while CMDY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. SECU is actively managed, while CMDY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. SECU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CMDY.
Performance
SECU vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SECU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDY
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SECU vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SECU iShares Securitized Income Active ETF | 2.00% |
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 8.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECU and CMDY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECU vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank
SECU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMDY
SECU vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SECU | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SECU vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECU drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECU and CMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECU | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -31.19% | +29.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -8.97% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -13.10% | +12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
SECU vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECU | CMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15% | 16.53% | -13.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 15.82% | -12.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 14.65% | -11.50% |
SECU vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECU vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison
SECU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than CMDY's 10.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDY iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF | 10.84% | 12.89% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 3.98% | 16.09% | 0.15% | 2.21% | 1.73% |
SECU iShares Securitized Income Active ETF | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SECU and CMDY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SECU.
CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.84%, compared with 2.52% for SECU.
SECU is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while CMDY is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SECU and 0.28% for CMDY.
Find the right allocation for SECU and CMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer