SECT vs. ITOT
SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SECT is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECT returned 12.80%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for ITOT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECT charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
SECT vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
SECT
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
SECT vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 11.86% | 17.80% | 18.61% | 21.10% | -12.80% | 28.88% | 15.65% | 28.06% | -9.66% | 9.39% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 9.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECT and ITOT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SECT and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SECT vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SECT
ITOT
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SECT
ITOT
Financial Services
SECT
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
SECT
ITOT
Communication Services
SECT
ITOT
Industrials
SECT
ITOT
Energy
SECT
ITOT
Basic Materials
SECT
ITOT
Healthcare
SECT
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
SECT
ITOT
Utilities
SECT
ITOT
Real Estate
SECT
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECT vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
SECT
ITOT
SECT vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.17 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | 14.57 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.32 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.74 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.57 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SECT vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -55.20% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -8.90% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.71% | -19.44% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -25.36% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.73% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -6.97% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.94% | +0.64% |
Volatility
SECT vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that SECT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.99% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 9.13% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 12.20% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 17.36% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 18.26% | +1.87% |
SECT vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECT vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 0.60% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% | 1.67% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SECT and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SECT has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECT dropped -38.09% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 5-year performance, SECT leads with 12.80% vs 12.69% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SECT has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for SECT.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.60% for SECT.
They also come from different issuers: Main Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for SECT and 0.03% for ITOT.
SECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SECT and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer