SECR vs. SMBS
SECR (NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF) and SMBS (Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. SECR is actively managed, while SMBS is passively managed. Over the past year, SECR returned 5.25% vs 6.78% for SMBS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECR charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SMBS.
Performance
SECR vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECR achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than SMBS's 0.70% return.
SECR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMBS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SECR vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SECR NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF | 0.66% | 7.85% | 0.16% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.70% | 8.15% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECR and SMBS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SECR and SMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECR vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank
SECR
SMBS
SECR vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECR | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.41 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 8.21 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECR | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.64 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SECR vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECR drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECR and SMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECR | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.20% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.83% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -1.33% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -0.84% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.83% | +0.14% |
Volatility
SECR vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison
NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECR | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.55% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 3.03% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 4.15% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 4.86% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 4.86% | -0.23% |
SECR vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECR has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECR vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison
SECR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than SMBS's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SECR NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF | 6.28% | 6.68% | 3.24% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.17% | 4.83% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SECR and SMBS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to SECR (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECR dropped -3.93% vs SMBS's -3.20%.
On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 5.25% for SECR. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SECR.
SECR has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 5.17% for SMBS.
They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SECR and 0.03% for SMBS.
SMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SECR and SMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer