PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEBFX vs. TNBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund (SEBFX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEBFX having a 1.49% return and TNBMX slightly higher at 1.50%.


SEBFX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.38%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
2.25%

TNBMX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.17%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEBFX
Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund
1.49%10.10%-0.75%6.95%-8.54%-1.77%6.86%7.18%-2.95%-0.85%
TNBMX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)
1.50%5.25%5.00%10.32%-12.30%-1.63%5.73%10.77%1.72%1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SEBFX and TNBMX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.47

The correlation between SEBFX and TNBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEBFX vs. TNBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEBFX
SEBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SEBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SEBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TNBMX
TNBMX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TNBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TNBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund (SEBFX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEBFXTNBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.08

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

7.41

-1.25

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the TNBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEBFX and TNBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEBFX drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum TNBMX drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEBFX and TNBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEBFXTNBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-15.78%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-2.32%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.51%

-2.32%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-15.48%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-3.04%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.65%

+0.24%

Volatility

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Volatility Comparison

Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund (SEBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) at 0.75%. This indicates that SEBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEBFXTNBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.75%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

2.22%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

2.61%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.93%

3.64%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

3.32%

+0.30%

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEBFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TNBMX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEBFX vs. TNBMX - Dividend Comparison

SEBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than TNBMX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SEBFX
Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund
3.83%3.89%3.28%3.68%0.65%2.61%0.89%2.60%3.05%2.75%2.61%
TNBMX
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)
5.05%4.76%4.24%2.85%10.20%2.84%1.90%4.65%8.20%0.64%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEBFX and TNBMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEBFX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to TNBMX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEBFX dropped -13.51% vs TNBMX's -15.78%.

TNBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEBFX and TNBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer