PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEAT vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEAT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEAT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SEAT
Vivid Seats Inc.
-11.65%-92.21%-26.74%-13.42%-32.90%10.43%0.20%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-3.65%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%6.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEAT achieves a -11.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -3.65% return.


SEAT

1D
7.78%
1M
10.02%
YTD
-11.65%
6M
-60.46%
1Y
-88.98%
3Y*
-65.31%
5Y*
-49.56%
10Y*

SPY

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-3.65%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vivid Seats Inc.

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

SEAT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEAT
SEAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEAT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEATSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.88

0.96

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.06

1.49

-3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.23

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.53

-2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.26

7.27

-8.52

SEAT vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEAT and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEATSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

0.96

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.76

0.70

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.74

0.56

-1.31

Correlation

The correlation between SEAT and SPY is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SEAT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

SEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEAT
Vivid Seats Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.13%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

SEAT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEAT drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAT and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEATSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.06%

-55.19%

-42.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.34%

-12.05%

-79.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.06%

-24.50%

-73.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.67%

-5.53%

-92.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.13%

-9.09%

-39.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.08%

2.54%

+68.54%

Volatility

SEAT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) has a higher volatility of 26.36% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.35%. This indicates that SEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEATSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.36%

5.35%

+21.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.53%

9.50%

+52.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.69%

19.06%

+81.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.66%

17.06%

+48.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.93%

17.92%

+45.01%