PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
SEAT vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SEAT and QYLD is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

SEAT vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 1, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).

QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEAT or QYLD.

Performance

SEAT vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SEAT:

-0.87

QYLD:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

SEAT:

-1.26

QYLD:

0.56

Omega Ratio

SEAT:

0.82

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

SEAT:

-0.77

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

SEAT:

-1.88

QYLD:

1.01

Ulcer Index

SEAT:

36.14%

QYLD:

5.60%

Daily Std Dev

SEAT:

78.17%

QYLD:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

SEAT:

-88.57%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

SEAT:

-88.57%

QYLD:

-9.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEAT achieves a -66.31% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's -5.59% return.

SEAT

YTD

-66.31%

1M

-41.79%

6M

-56.42%

1Y

-69.11%

3Y*

-44.51%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

-5.59%

1M

1.26%

6M

-3.85%

1Y

6.20%

3Y*

9.43%

5Y*

7.91%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vivid Seats Inc.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEAT vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SEAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SEAT is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SEAT is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SEAT is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SEAT is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SEAT is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SEAT is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SEAT vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEAT and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SEAT vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SEAT
Vivid Seats Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF		13.78%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

SEAT vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEAT drawdown since its inception was -88.57%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAT and QYLD.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SEAT vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) has a higher volatility of 52.58% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that SEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...