SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and PSWD.DE (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SEAC.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while PSWD.DE tracks the FTSE RAFI All-World 3000. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEAC.DE returned 9.78%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for PSWD.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PSWD.DE.

Performance

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than PSWD.DE's 17.57% return.

SEAC.DE

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 7.51%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 13.93%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: —

PSWD.DE

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 17.57%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	10.96%	1.57%	23.07%	24.92%	-20.44%	36.19%	7.52%	32.12%	-19.09%
PSWD.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF	17.57%	14.61%	17.71%	12.73%	-3.65%	31.90%	-3.86%	26.31%	-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018	0.81

The correlation between SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEAC.DE

SEAC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 50
SEAC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SEAC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SEAC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SEAC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SEAC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PSWD.DE

PSWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PSWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PSWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PSWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEAC.DE	PSWD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.92	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.96	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.54	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	5.35	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	21.41	-15.02

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEAC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, smaller than the maximum PSWD.DE drawdown of -36.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEAC.DE	PSWD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.50%	-36.38%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-5.88%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.60%	-18.19%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.64%	-18.19%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-0.74%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-4.62%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	1.47%	+1.34%

Volatility

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) at 2.54%. This indicates that SEAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEAC.DE	PSWD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	2.54%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	8.27%	+1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	10.89%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.45%	13.21%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	15.09%	+2.52%

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than PSWD.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEAC.DE vs. PSWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

SEAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSWD.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF	1.68%	2.03%	2.27%	2.48%	2.66%	1.92%	1.98%	2.37%	2.56%	2.06%	1.97%	2.02%
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE in my portfolio?

SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SEAC.DE or PSWD.DE?

On fees, SEAC.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEAC.DE or PSWD.DE?

SEAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSWD.DE.

What is the main difference between SEAC.DE and PSWD.DE?

SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while PSWD.DE tracks FTSE RAFI All-World 3000. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.39% for PSWD.DE.