SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE
SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and CBUI.DE (iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - SEAC.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while CBUI.DE tracks the MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEAC.DE returned 14.37%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for CBUI.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CBUI.DE.
Performance
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.
SEAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUI.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 43.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.72% | 1.57% | 23.09% | 24.89% | -20.42% | 4.30% |
CBUI.DE iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 20.05% | 20.98% | 13.82% | 15.94% | -6.30% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAC.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SEAC.DE and CBUI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAC.DE
CBUI.DE
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAC.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 6.92 | -6.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 26.41 | -24.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAC.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 3.41 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.05 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, which is greater than CBUI.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and CBUI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAC.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -19.48% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -6.34% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -19.48% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -0.22% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -3.23% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 1.67% | +9.20% |
Volatility
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) is 3.05%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that SEAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAC.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.73% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 9.76% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 12.88% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 14.21% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 14.21% | +3.80% |
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEAC.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEAC.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAC.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEAC.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUI.DE.
SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAC.DE and CBUI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer