SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SEAC.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEAC.DE returned 10.67%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.
SEAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.72% | 1.57% | 23.09% | 24.89% | -20.42% | 36.15% | 10.68% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.15% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAC.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SEAC.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAC.DE
4UBQ.DE
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAC.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.46 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 4.10 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 15.73 | -14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAC.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.47 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.00 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.11 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAC.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -23.35% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -6.93% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -23.35% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -23.35% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | 0.00% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -4.02% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 1.81% | +9.06% |
Volatility
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that SEAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAC.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.81% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 7.61% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 11.53% | +13.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 15.27% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 15.39% | +2.62% |
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SEAC.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEAC.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAC.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SEAC.DE.
SEAC.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAC.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer