PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA.TO vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold Inc.
3.71%148.11%2.12%3.76%-3.43%-21.96%49.11%-0.33%26.28%29.26%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
23.33%37.84%-8.09%8.61%26.92%-4.54%33.92%26.63%5.31%35.65%
Different Trading Currencies

SEA.TO is traded in CAD, while RIO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RIO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEA.TO:

CA$4.40B

RIO:

$155.34B

EPS

SEA.TO:

-CA$0.52

RIO:

$13.11

PB Ratio

SEA.TO:

3.91

RIO:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEA.TO:

CA$0.00

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEA.TO:

-CA$58.00K

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

SEA.TO:

-CA$44.84M

RIO:

$40.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA.TO achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 23.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SEA.TO has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 13.90%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.69% annualized return.


SEA.TO

1D
6.97%
1M
-21.44%
YTD
3.71%
6M
21.13%
1Y
157.95%
3Y*
38.49%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
13.90%

RIO

1D
1.49%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
23.33%
6M
46.61%
1Y
61.03%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
21.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEA.TO vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA.TO
SEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEA.TORIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

2.31

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.89

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

4.06

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.67

12.21

+1.45

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA.TO and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEA.TORIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.31

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.54

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.77

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.47

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between SEA.TO and RIO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

SEA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%9.24%15.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
4.24%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Drawdowns

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than RIO's maximum drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA.TO and RIO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEA.TORIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-88.97%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.40%

-15.19%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.07%

-36.97%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-37.47%

-21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.49%

-3.29%

-18.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.82%

-23.88%

-39.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.12%

4.58%

+6.54%

Volatility

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.81% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 10.00%. This indicates that SEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEA.TORIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.81%

10.00%

+12.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.28%

19.97%

+29.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.14%

26.58%

+32.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.02%

26.41%

+22.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

28.42%

+21.42%

Financials

SEA.TO vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seabridge Gold Inc. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
30.65B
(SEA.TO) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SEA.TO values in CAD, RIO values in USD