PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SEA.TO vs. AEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SEA.TOAEM
YTD Return27.90%44.28%
1Y Return28.78%66.77%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.77%14.07%
5Y Return (Ann)4.36%8.55%
10Y Return (Ann)9.60%13.72%
Sharpe Ratio0.562.18
Sortino Ratio1.182.71
Omega Ratio1.141.35
Calmar Ratio0.411.53
Martin Ratio2.6310.54
Ulcer Index10.30%6.20%
Daily Std Dev48.33%29.96%
Max Drawdown-97.27%-90.33%
Current Drawdown-45.79%-12.62%

Fundamentals


SEA.TOAEM
Market CapCA$1.90B$39.23B
EPSCA$0.09$1.95
PE Ratio227.8939.56
PEG Ratio0.0028.15
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$0.00$7.86B
Gross Profit (TTM)-CA$289.00K$2.97B
EBITDA (TTM)-CA$15.12M$4.27B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SEA.TO and AEM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SEA.TO achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 44.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SEA.TO has underperformed AEM with an annualized return of 9.60%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.71%
14.05%
SEA.TO
AEM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEA.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SEA.TO, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SEA.TO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SEA.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SEA.TO, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SEA.TO, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.23
AEM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEM, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEM, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEM, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEM, currently valued at 9.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.77

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA.TO and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.50
2.04
SEA.TO
AEM

Dividends

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

SEA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SEA.TO
Seabridge Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
2.06%2.92%3.08%2.63%1.35%1.10%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%1.29%3.34%

Drawdowns

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.27%, which is greater than AEM's maximum drawdown of -90.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA.TO and AEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-62.31%
-12.62%
SEA.TO
AEM

Volatility

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 11.10%. This indicates that SEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.85%
11.10%
SEA.TO
AEM

Financials

SEA.TO vs. AEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seabridge Gold Inc. and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. SEA.TO values in CAD, AEM values in USD