SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) and Skeena Resources Limited (SKE.TO).
Performance
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEA.TO Seabridge Gold Inc. | 3.71% | 148.11% | 2.12% | 3.76% | -3.43% | -21.96% | 49.11% | -0.33% | 26.28% | 29.26% |
SKE.TO Skeena Resources Limited | 32.09% | 160.80% | 93.80% | -10.54% | -45.25% | -4.29% | 405.88% | 126.67% | -57.14% | -91.25% |
Fundamentals
SEA.TO:
CA$4.40B
SKE.TO:
CA$5.15B
SEA.TO:
-CA$0.52
SKE.TO:
-CA$1.57
SEA.TO:
3.91
SKE.TO:
32.37
SEA.TO:
CA$0.00
SKE.TO:
CA$0.00
SEA.TO:
-CA$58.00K
SKE.TO:
-CA$613.00K
SEA.TO:
-CA$44.84M
SKE.TO:
-CA$76.68M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEA.TO achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than SKE.TO's 32.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SEA.TO has outperformed SKE.TO with an annualized return of 13.90%, while SKE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.
SEA.TO
- 1D
- 6.97%
- 1M
- -21.44%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 21.13%
- 1Y
- 157.95%
- 3Y*
- 38.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
SKE.TO
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- 32.09%
- 6M
- 68.20%
- 1Y
- 197.99%
- 3Y*
- 73.25%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SEA.TO
SKE.TO
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) and Skeena Resources Limited (SKE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEA.TO | SKE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.69 | 3.43 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 3.39 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.44 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 6.42 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 21.13 | -7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEA.TO | SKE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 3.43 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.04 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.00 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEA.TO and SKE.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEA.TO nor SKE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEA.TO Seabridge Gold Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.24% | 15.26% |
SKE.TO Skeena Resources Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum SKE.TO drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA.TO and SKE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEA.TO | SKE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -99.99% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.40% | -30.66% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.07% | -73.87% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.29% | -98.65% | +39.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.49% | -99.56% | +78.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.82% | -80.37% | +16.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.12% | 9.31% | +1.81% |
Volatility
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Seabridge Gold Inc. (SEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.81% compared to Skeena Resources Limited (SKE.TO) at 15.66%. This indicates that SEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEA.TO | SKE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.81% | 15.66% | +7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.28% | 44.66% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.14% | 58.03% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.02% | 55.45% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 82.08% | -32.24% |
Financials
SEA.TO vs. SKE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seabridge Gold Inc. and Skeena Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities