SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI
SE15.L (iShares EUR Corporate Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SE15.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while CSNDX.MI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SE15.L returned 2.18%/yr vs 22.43%/yr for CSNDX.MI. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SE15.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CSNDX.MI.
Performance
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SE15.L is traded in GBP, while CSNDX.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSNDX.MI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SE15.L achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CSNDX.MI's 19.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SE15.L has underperformed CSNDX.MI with an annualized return of 2.18%, while CSNDX.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 22.43% annualized return.
SE15.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 19.48%
- 6M
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 41.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 22.43%
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE15.L iShares EUR Corporate Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | -0.33% | 9.40% | 0.01% | 4.04% | -2.64% | -6.64% | 6.70% | -2.39% | 0.34% | 4.51% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.48% | 12.29% | 29.20% | 47.07% | -26.42% | 29.96% | 43.10% | 34.53% | 5.08% | 21.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SE15.L and CSNDX.MI is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2010 | 0.08 |
The correlation between SE15.L and CSNDX.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank
SE15.L
CSNDX.MI
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SE15.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SE15.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.48 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 3.78 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 10.95 | -6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SE15.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 2.74 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.96 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 1.14 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.07 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SE15.L drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE15.L and CSNDX.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SE15.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -27.56% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -10.94% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.25% | -25.15% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.15% | -27.56% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.55% | -27.56% | +12.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.68% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -4.63% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 3.78% | -2.51% |
Volatility
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SE15.L) is 1.31%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that SE15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSNDX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SE15.L | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 4.53% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 10.52% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 15.11% | -10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 19.36% | -13.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 19.55% | -12.50% |
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SE15.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SE15.L vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison
SE15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while CSNDX.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SE15.L iShares EUR Corporate Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.51% | 3.34% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 0.58% | 0.68% | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.69% | 0.77% | 1.05% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SE15.L and CSNDX.MI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SE15.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SE15.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
SE15.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while CSNDX.MI is Nasdaq-100. SE15.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Corp 1-3 Yr TR EUR, while CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SE15.L and 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
Find the right allocation for SE15.L and CSNDX.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer