PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SE vs. RIGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SE vs. RIGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -16.33% return, which is significantly lower than RIGL's -14.06% return.


SE

1D
0.47%
1M
4.31%
6M
-8.37%
YTD
-16.33%
1Y
-31.86%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
-17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.92%

RIGL

1D
-3.28%
1M
-3.87%
6M
5.59%
YTD
-14.06%
1Y
74.79%
3Y*
40.40%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
3.86%
ALL TIME*
-10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.43M$14.01M$13.32M
$416.43M$503.28M$427.19M

SE vs. RIGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SE
Sea Limited
-16.33%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%394.90%255.30%-15.08%-17.97%
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-14.06%154.64%16.00%-3.33%-43.40%-24.29%63.55%-6.96%-40.72%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SE and RIGL is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SE:

$64.08B

RIGL:

$681.06M

EPS

SE:

$2.53

RIGL:

$18.94

PE Ratio

SE:

42.20

RIGL:

1.94

PEG Ratio

SE:

0.20

RIGL:

0.00

PS Ratio

SE:

2.70

RIGL:

2.36

PB Ratio

SE:

5.28

RIGL:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

SE:

$25.19B

RIGL:

$299.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SE:

$11.15B

RIGL:

$279.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

SE:

$2.33B

RIGL:

$125.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SE vs. RIGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

RIGL
RIGL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RIGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SE vs. RIGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SERIGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.25

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

1.50

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

2.51

-3.30

SE vs. RIGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the RIGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and RIGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SE vs. RIGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, smaller than the maximum RIGL drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and RIGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SERIGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.51%

-99.37%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.22%

-50.08%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.22%

-50.76%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.51%

-83.85%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.91%

-96.55%

+25.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-90.93%

+46.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.54%

29.86%

+10.68%

Volatility

SE vs. RIGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sea Limited (SE) is 11.04%, while Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that SE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SERIGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.04%

11.97%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.24%

34.77%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.46%

70.02%

-18.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.24%

85.52%

-21.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.35%

82.76%

-20.41%

Dividends

SE vs. RIGL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SE nor RIGL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SE vs. RIGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sea Limited and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SE vs. RIGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sea Limited and Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

RIGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.

SE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

RIGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

SE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

RIGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SE and RIGL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIGL has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to SE (11.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SE dropped -90.51% vs RIGL's -99.37%.

RIGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SE and RIGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer