PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIGL vs. IAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIGL vs. IAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RIGL

1D
0.54%
1M
2.11%
YTD
-29.91%
6M
-32.40%
1Y
48.98%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
-4.61%
10Y*
1.65%

IAS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIGL vs. IAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-29.91%154.64%16.00%-3.33%-43.40%-38.94%
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
0.00%-0.96%-27.45%63.71%-60.42%7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RIGL and IAS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.23

The correlation between RIGL and IAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIGL:

$590.97M

IAS:

$1.76B

EPS

RIGL:

$19.21

IAS:

$0.28

PE Ratio

RIGL:

1.56

IAS:

37.31

PEG Ratio

RIGL:

0.00

IAS:

0.22

PS Ratio

RIGL:

1.90

IAS:

2.95

PB Ratio

RIGL:

1.48

IAS:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIGL:

$299.77M

IAS:

$590.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIGL:

$279.95M

IAS:

$457.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIGL:

$125.80M

IAS:

$119.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIGL vs. IAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIGL
RIGL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RIGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IAS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIGL vs. IAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIGLIASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.02

RIGL vs. IAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIGLIASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

Drawdowns

RIGL vs. IAS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIGLIASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.87%

Volatility

RIGL vs. IAS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIGLIASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.84%

Dividends

RIGL vs. IAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIGL nor IAS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RIGL vs. IAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
58.82M
154.36M
(RIGL) Total Revenue
(IAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIGL vs. IAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.2%
77.0%
Portfolio components
RIGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.

IAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.81M and revenue of 154.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.0%.

RIGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

IAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 7.57M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

RIGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

IAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a net income of 7.05M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIGL and IAS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIGL and IAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer