PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SE vs. IAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SE vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -34.98% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 0.97% return.


SE

1D
-3.21%
1M
-11.31%
YTD
-34.98%
6M
-33.66%
1Y
-46.36%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
-21.47%
10Y*

IAG

1D
3.16%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
0.97%
6M
5.11%
1Y
120.82%
3Y*
80.32%
5Y*
35.17%
10Y*
16.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SE vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SE
Sea Limited
-34.98%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%394.90%255.30%-15.08%-17.97%
IAG
IAMGOLD Corporation
0.97%219.57%103.95%-1.94%-17.57%-14.71%-1.61%1.36%-36.88%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SE and IAG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SE:

$52.76B

IAG:

$9.89B

EPS

SE:

$2.57

IAG:

$1.73

PE Ratio

SE:

32.21

IAG:

9.63

PEG Ratio

SE:

0.15

IAG:

0.06

PS Ratio

SE:

2.06

IAG:

2.84

PB Ratio

SE:

4.11

IAG:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

SE:

$25.19B

IAG:

$3.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SE:

$11.15B

IAG:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

SE:

$2.33B

IAG:

$1.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SE vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG
IAG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SE vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.31

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

3.07

-3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

7.68

-8.95

SE vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and IAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SE vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and IAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.51%

-95.55%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.22%

-39.60%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.22%

-39.60%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.51%

-73.69%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.40%

-32.23%

-45.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.10%

-56.18%

+12.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.57%

15.80%

+20.77%

Volatility

SE vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sea Limited (SE) is 14.69%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 20.86%. This indicates that SE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.69%

20.86%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.05%

49.19%

-11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.74%

61.99%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.13%

60.55%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.59%

58.65%

+3.94%

Dividends

SE vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither SE nor IAG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SE vs. IAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sea Limited and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.10B
1.03B
(SE) Total Revenue
(IAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SE vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sea Limited and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
55.4%
Portfolio components
SE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

SE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

SE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SE and IAG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAG has higher volatility (20.86%) compared to SE (14.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SE dropped -90.51% vs IAG's -95.55%.

IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SE and IAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer