PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDY vs. SDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDY vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 21.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SDY having a 9.43% annualized return and SDOG not far ahead at 9.72%.


SDY

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.40%
6M
4.24%
YTD
14.35%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
9.43%
ALL TIME*
9.07%

SDOG

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.78%
6M
10.94%
YTD
21.12%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
9.72%
ALL TIME*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.61M$3.57M$3.76M
$32.37M$30.67M$33.82M

SDY vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
14.35%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
21.12%11.12%14.70%4.19%-0.20%24.59%-0.35%24.02%-11.43%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SDY and SDOG is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.91

The correlation between SDY and SDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDY vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDY
SDOG

Industrials

17.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

16.3%
10.2%

Utilities

14.2%
10.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
10.3%

Technology

10.3%
11.2%

Healthcare

7.9%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
16.8%

Basic Materials

5.8%
3.3%

Real Estate

4.4%

-

Energy

2.8%
9.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.4%

Industrials

SDY
17.5%
SDOG
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SDY
16.3%
SDOG
10.2%

Utilities

SDY
14.2%
SDOG
10.5%

Financial Services

SDY
12.6%
SDOG
10.3%

Technology

SDY
10.3%
SDOG
11.2%

Healthcare

SDY
7.9%
SDOG
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SDY
5.9%
SDOG
16.8%

Basic Materials

SDY
5.8%
SDOG
3.3%

Real Estate

SDY
4.4%
SDOG

-

Energy

SDY
2.8%
SDOG
9.6%

Communication Services

SDY
2.2%
SDOG
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDY vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SDOG
SDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDY vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDYSDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.86

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

16.67

-10.75

SDY vs. SDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the SDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDY and SDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDY vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and SDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYSDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.75%

-43.56%

-11.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-6.24%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-16.00%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.21%

-19.84%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-43.56%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.85%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-4.87%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.82%

+1.03%

Volatility

SDY vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) have volatilities of 4.13% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDYSDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.98%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

8.45%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

11.59%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

15.33%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

18.98%

-1.89%

SDY vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDY vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison

SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than SDOG's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.31%3.68%3.86%4.29%3.87%3.62%3.63%3.37%4.03%3.27%3.32%3.61%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.37%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDY and SDOG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDY has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to SDOG (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs SDOG's -43.56%.

On 10-year performance, SDOG leads with 9.72% vs 9.43% for SDY. On fees, SDY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.37% for SDY.

SDY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.36% for SDOG.

SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDY and SDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer