PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDY vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDY vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SDY has underperformed QVAL with an annualized return of 9.29%, while QVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


SDY

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.49%
6M
7.45%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
9.29%

QVAL

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.68%
6M
15.27%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDY vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
7.49%8.18%8.45%2.61%-0.54%25.32%1.71%23.29%-2.74%15.82%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.68%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SDY and QVAL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.78

The correlation between SDY and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDY vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDY
QVAL

Industrials

17.5%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

17.1%
7.9%

Utilities

14.8%

-

Financial Services

11.5%

-

Technology

8.7%
16.7%

Basic Materials

6.4%
7.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
32.4%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.0%

Energy

4.6%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.8%

Industrials

SDY
17.5%
QVAL
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDY
17.1%
QVAL
7.9%

Utilities

SDY
14.8%
QVAL

-

Financial Services

SDY
11.5%
QVAL

-

Technology

SDY
8.7%
QVAL
16.7%

Basic Materials

SDY
6.4%
QVAL
7.6%

Healthcare

SDY
6.2%
QVAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SDY
5.2%
QVAL
32.4%

Real Estate

SDY
4.6%
QVAL
2.0%

Energy

SDY
4.6%
QVAL
5.5%

Communication Services

SDY
3.5%
QVAL
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDY vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDY
SDY Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDY vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDYQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.93

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

13.98

-9.38

SDY vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDY and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDYQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.07

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.56

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.51

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Drawdowns

SDY vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, which is greater than QVAL's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDYQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.75%

-51.49%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-6.04%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-21.41%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.21%

-27.17%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-51.49%

+14.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-0.78%

-3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-7.80%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.13%

+0.66%

Volatility

SDY vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 2.47%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDYQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

4.16%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

10.06%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

14.44%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

21.63%

-7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

22.79%

-5.71%

SDY vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDY vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than QVAL's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
SDY
SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
2.48%2.61%2.56%2.64%2.55%2.63%2.85%2.45%2.73%4.69%3.30%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDY and QVAL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SDY (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.64% vs 9.29% for SDY. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 9.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.

SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDY and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer