SDY vs. MDYG
SDY (SPDR S&P Dividend ETF) and MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDY is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while MDYG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDY returned 9.61%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for MDYG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDYG.
Performance
SDY vs. MDYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDY achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than MDYG's 18.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SDY has underperformed MDYG with an annualized return of 9.61%, while MDYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.
SDY
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 16.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
MDYG
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 31.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SDY vs. MDYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 10.37% | 8.18% | 8.45% | 2.61% | -0.54% | 25.32% | 1.71% | 23.29% | -2.74% | 15.82% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 18.87% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDY and MDYG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SDY and MDYG has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SDY vs. MDYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDY
MDYG
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
SDY
MDYG
Consumer Defensive
SDY
MDYG
Utilities
SDY
MDYG
Financial Services
SDY
MDYG
Technology
SDY
MDYG
Healthcare
SDY
MDYG
Basic Materials
SDY
MDYG
Consumer Cyclical
SDY
MDYG
Real Estate
SDY
MDYG
Energy
SDY
MDYG
Communication Services
SDY
MDYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDY vs. MDYG — Risk / Return Rank
SDY
MDYG
SDY vs. MDYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDY | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.98 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 11.86 | -6.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDY vs. MDYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDY drawdown since its inception was -54.75%, smaller than the maximum MDYG drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDY and MDYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDY | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.75% | -58.44% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -9.91% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -25.45% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.21% | -29.26% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | -39.27% | +2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.48% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -8.02% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.49% | +0.34% |
Volatility
SDY vs. MDYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) is 2.89%, while SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that SDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDY | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 6.17% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.47% | 13.87% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.42% | 17.59% | -7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 20.70% | -6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 21.09% | -4.00% |
SDY vs. MDYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDY vs. MDYG - Dividend Comparison
SDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than MDYG's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
SDY SPDR S&P Dividend ETF | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 2.55% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.45% | 2.73% | 4.69% | 3.30% | 6.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDY and MDYG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYG has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to SDY (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDY dropped -54.75% vs MDYG's -58.44%.
On 10-year performance, MDYG leads with 11.74% vs 9.61% for SDY. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SDY has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MDYG has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SDY.
SDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.61% for MDYG.
SDY is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while MDYG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SDY tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDY and 0.15% for MDYG.
MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDY and MDYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer