PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVGX vs. SNIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) and SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVGX achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than SNIGX's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SDVGX has underperformed SNIGX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while SNIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


SDVGX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.12%
YTD
6.66%
6M
6.47%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
12.45%

SNIGX

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
4.23%
6M
4.37%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDVGX
SIT Dividend Growth Fund
6.66%18.73%18.22%14.89%-12.17%27.87%7.79%29.18%-6.86%20.22%
SNIGX
SIT Large Cap Growth Fund
4.23%15.24%26.21%39.68%-28.26%28.39%33.99%32.89%-3.28%27.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SDVGX and SNIGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.92

The correlation between SDVGX and SNIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVGX vs. SNIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVGX
SDVGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SNIGX
SNIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SNIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SNIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) and SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDVGXSNIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.64

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

6.25

+6.75

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the SNIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVGX and SNIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVGX drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, smaller than the maximum SNIGX drawdown of -64.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVGX and SNIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVGXSNIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.52%

-64.95%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-12.99%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.39%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-32.14%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

-32.14%

-2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-3.19%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-15.74%

+10.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.40%

-1.65%

Volatility

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) is 3.19%, while SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that SDVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVGXSNIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

4.86%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

11.05%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

14.12%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

20.18%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

20.54%

-3.34%

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SNIGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVGX vs. SNIGX - Dividend Comparison

SDVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than SNIGX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDVGX
SIT Dividend Growth Fund
9.48%10.10%12.47%4.66%12.01%12.29%1.42%12.85%25.20%11.49%8.32%13.23%
SNIGX
SIT Large Cap Growth Fund
2.04%2.13%4.01%1.84%3.87%5.89%5.33%9.56%10.20%11.95%7.73%29.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVGX and SNIGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNIGX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to SDVGX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVGX dropped -45.52% vs SNIGX's -64.95%.

SDVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVGX and SNIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer