PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNIGX vs. RYOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNIGX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than RYOCX's 10.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SNIGX has underperformed RYOCX with an annualized return of 15.94%, while RYOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.18% annualized return.


SNIGX

1D
1.86%
1M
0.83%
6M
6.09%
YTD
5.47%
1Y
16.92%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
15.94%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

RYOCX

1D
3.36%
1M
-4.24%
6M
9.68%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
19.18%
ALL TIME*
14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNIGX
SIT Large Cap Growth Fund
5.47%15.24%26.21%39.68%-28.26%28.39%33.99%32.89%-3.28%27.78%
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
10.92%19.51%24.34%53.31%-33.34%25.85%46.80%40.33%-1.36%31.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SNIGX and RYOCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.91

The correlation between SNIGX and RYOCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNIGX vs. RYOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SNIGX
SNIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SNIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SNIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RYOCX
RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNIGXRYOCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.61

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

5.15

-1.14

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the RYOCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNIGX and RYOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNIGX drawdown since its inception was -64.95%, smaller than the maximum RYOCX drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNIGX and RYOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNIGXRYOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.95%

-83.75%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-12.31%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.39%

-22.97%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-38.04%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

-38.04%

+5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-8.44%

+6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.70%

-31.74%

+16.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.84%

-0.27%

Volatility

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) is 3.90%, while Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SNIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNIGXRYOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

6.87%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

15.99%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

19.37%

-4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

23.27%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

22.82%

-2.30%

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNIGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYOCX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Dividend Comparison

SNIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than RYOCX's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
3.86%4.28%7.23%0.00%8.82%4.47%4.17%3.80%1.86%6.00%1.75%2.03%
SNIGX
SIT Large Cap Growth Fund
2.02%2.13%4.01%1.84%3.87%5.89%5.33%9.56%10.20%11.95%7.73%29.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNIGX and RYOCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYOCX has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SNIGX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNIGX dropped -64.95% vs RYOCX's -83.75%.

RYOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNIGX and RYOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer