SNIGX vs. RYOCX
Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX).
SNIGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 2, 1982. RYOCX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 1994.
Performance
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNIGX SIT Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.44% | 15.24% | 26.21% | 39.68% | -28.26% | 28.39% | 33.99% | 32.89% | -3.28% | 27.78% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | -6.11% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNIGX achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than RYOCX's -6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SNIGX has underperformed RYOCX with an annualized return of 14.59%, while RYOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.78% annualized return.
SNIGX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.59%
RYOCX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -6.11%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNIGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYOCX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SNIGX vs. RYOCX — Risk / Return Rank
SNIGX
RYOCX
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNIGX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.56 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.76 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 6.38 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNIGX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.52 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.79 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SNIGX and RYOCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Dividend Comparison
SNIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than RYOCX's 4.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNIGX SIT Large Cap Growth Fund | 2.33% | 2.13% | 4.01% | 1.84% | 3.87% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 9.56% | 10.20% | 11.95% | 7.73% | 29.92% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 4.56% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNIGX drawdown since its inception was -64.95%, smaller than the maximum RYOCX drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNIGX and RYOCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNIGX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.95% | -83.75% | +18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -12.75% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.14% | -38.04% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.14% | -38.04% | +5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.01% | -9.31% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.81% | -32.05% | +16.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.52% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SNIGX vs. RYOCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SIT Large Cap Growth Fund (SNIGX) is 5.98%, while Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that SNIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SNIGX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 6.57% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 12.88% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 22.75% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 22.79% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.58% | -2.10% |