SDVGX vs. MGV
SDVGX (SIT Dividend Growth Fund) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both funds - SDVGX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Sit, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, SDVGX returned 12.66%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDVGX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
SDVGX vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDVGX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SDVGX has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.66%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
SDVGX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
MGV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
SDVGX vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDVGX SIT Dividend Growth Fund | 6.54% | 18.73% | 18.22% | 14.89% | -12.17% | 27.87% | 7.79% | 29.18% | -6.86% | 20.22% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDVGX and MGV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SDVGX and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDVGX vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
SDVGX
MGV
SDVGX vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDVGX | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 4.45 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 16.89 | -3.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDVGX vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDVGX drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVGX and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDVGX | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.52% | -56.07% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -6.42% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -13.18% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.13% | -16.54% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.01% | -35.41% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.82% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -7.77% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.69% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SDVGX vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) is 3.10%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that SDVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDVGX | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 3.49% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 7.82% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.39% | 10.18% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 13.58% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 16.32% | +0.89% |
SDVGX vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDVGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDVGX vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
SDVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than MGV's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
SDVGX SIT Dividend Growth Fund | 9.49% | 10.10% | 12.47% | 4.66% | 12.01% | 12.29% | 1.42% | 12.85% | 25.20% | 11.49% | 8.32% | 13.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDVGX and MGV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SDVGX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVGX dropped -45.52% vs MGV's -56.07%.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDVGX and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer