SDVGX vs. QKACX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SDVGX (SIT Dividend Growth Fund) and QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SDVGX returned 12.36%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for QKACX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDVGX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for QKACX.

Performance

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVGX achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than QKACX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SDVGX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 12.36%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.

SDVGX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 6.92%
• 1Y: 23.50%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 12.36%

QKACX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 22.40%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 15.66%
• 10Y*: 16.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDVGX SIT Dividend Growth Fund	6.60%	18.73%	18.22%	14.89%	-12.17%	27.87%	7.79%	29.18%	-6.86%	20.22%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	6.95%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SDVGX and QKACX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between SDVGX and QKACX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SDVGX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVGX

SDVGX Risk / Return Rank: 62
SDVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SDVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SDVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SDVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SDVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDVGX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	1.95	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	2.85	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.70	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.59	12.64	+0.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the QKACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVGX and QKACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDVGX	QKACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	1.95	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.90	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.90	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.48	+0.12

Drawdowns

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVGX drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, smaller than the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVGX and QKACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDVGX	QKACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.52%	-60.51%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-8.66%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	-19.42%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.13%	-23.05%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.01%	-36.47%	+1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.02%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-11.20%	+6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.85%	-0.12%

Volatility

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Dividend Growth Fund (SDVGX) is 2.32%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that SDVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QKACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDVGX	QKACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	2.72%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	9.47%	-1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.17%	11.99%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	17.37%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	18.70%	-1.51%

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDVGX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison

SDVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than QKACX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.42%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%
SDVGX SIT Dividend Growth Fund	9.49%	10.10%	12.47%	4.66%	12.01%	12.29%	1.42%	12.85%	25.20%	11.49%	8.32%	13.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDVGX and QKACX in my portfolio?

SDVGX and QKACX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDVGX or QKACX?

QKACX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to SDVGX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVGX dropped -45.52% vs QKACX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.