PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDVD vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDVD vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDVD achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.


SDVD

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.75%
6M
8.14%
1Y
19.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDVD vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDVD and GRID is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2023

0.70

The correlation between SDVD and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDVD vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDVD
SDVD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SDVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDVD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SDVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDVD vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDVDGRIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

2.67

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

3.50

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

4.42

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.65

16.72

-9.07

SDVD vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDVD and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDVDGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.67

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.57

+0.20

Drawdowns

SDVD vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDVD drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDVD and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDVDGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-40.56%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-11.73%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-1.33%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-8.43%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.09%

-0.52%

Volatility

SDVD vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is 3.78%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that SDVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDVDGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

7.95%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

16.08%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

19.39%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

21.00%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

22.81%

-4.62%

SDVD vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDVD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDVD vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

SDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
8.95%8.36%9.26%3.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDVD and GRID have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to SDVD (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDVD dropped -24.17% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 1-year performance, GRID leads with 51.55% vs 19.64% for SDVD. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, SDVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRID has performed better with a 51.55% return vs 19.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDVD.

SDVD has the higher dividend yield at 8.95%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

SDVD is categorized as Derivative Income, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. SDVD tracks Nasdaq US Small-Mid Cap Rising Dividend Achievers Index, while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SDVD and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDVD and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer