SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L
SDUS.L (iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SDUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDUS.L returned 14.04%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for ISAC.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDUS.L achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.54% return.
SDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 28.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDUS.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.25% | 17.72% | 26.89% | 30.69% | -21.32% | 28.28% | 22.03% | 30.98% | -7.54% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.54% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | -18.16% | 18.85% | 15.66% | 25.77% | -5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDUS.L and ISAC.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SDUS.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Financial Services
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Communication Services
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Consumer Cyclical
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Healthcare
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Industrials
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Consumer Defensive
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Real Estate
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Energy
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Basic Materials
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Utilities
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDUS.L
ISAC.L
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDUS.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.27 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 13.72 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDUS.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.31 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.73 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDUS.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDUS.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -33.82% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -8.77% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -16.56% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -26.07% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.72% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -4.69% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.10% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) is 3.55%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that SDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDUS.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.84% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.26% | 9.77% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 12.40% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 15.57% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 15.95% | +2.28% |
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
SDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDUS.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 0.95% | 1.18% | 1.40% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SDUS.L and ISAC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
SDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. SDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SDUS.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for SDUS.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer