PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDUS.L achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.54% return.


SDUS.L

1D
0.08%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.25%
6M
10.89%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*

ISAC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.54%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.25%17.72%26.89%30.69%-21.32%28.28%22.03%30.98%-7.54%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.54%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.77%-5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SDUS.L and ISAC.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.95

The correlation between SDUS.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDUS.L
ISAC.L

Technology

38.0%
33.9%

Financial Services

12.4%
17.3%

Communication Services

12.1%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
8.5%

Healthcare

9.2%
7.8%

Industrials

7.7%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.2%

Energy

1.9%
3.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.9%

Utilities

1.3%
2.2%

Technology

SDUS.L
38.0%
ISAC.L
33.9%

Financial Services

SDUS.L
12.4%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Communication Services

SDUS.L
12.1%
ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SDUS.L
10.8%
ISAC.L
8.5%

Healthcare

SDUS.L
9.2%
ISAC.L
7.8%

Industrials

SDUS.L
7.7%
ISAC.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

SDUS.L
2.7%
ISAC.L
4.4%

Real Estate

SDUS.L
2.0%
ISAC.L
1.2%

Energy

SDUS.L
1.9%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

SDUS.L
1.8%
ISAC.L
2.9%

Utilities

SDUS.L
1.3%
ISAC.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDUS.L
SDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDUS.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.27

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

13.72

-1.23

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDUS.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDUS.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.31

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.73

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Drawdowns

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDUS.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDUS.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-33.82%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-8.77%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-16.56%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-26.07%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.72%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-4.69%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

2.10%

+0.18%

Volatility

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SDUS.L) is 3.55%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that SDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDUS.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.84%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.77%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

12.40%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.57%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

15.95%

+2.28%

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SDUS.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

SDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDUS.L
iShares MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.73%0.80%0.90%1.06%1.32%0.95%1.18%1.40%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SDUS.L and ISAC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.

SDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. SDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SDUS.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDUS.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer